Let's all have a nice debate here.
First: I am NOT an environmentalist. Environmentalism just doesn't work. It's too extreme. The principle of the degree I'm studying is to accept that human activity will inevitably produce pollution. The aim is to minimise said pollution, by thinking about what you're doing.
Second: Yeah, I do like cars, I even have a subscription to Top Gear magazine. But even TG now accept the fact that more efficient cars are better, you see them encouraging the small cars that manage high MPG figures. They also generally enjoy making fun of inefficient American cars.
I used to drive a 1975 Land Rover Series 3, it could do about 20mpg. What's worrying is that a lot of modern American SUVs STILL can't manage this. The Escalade Hybrid was American Green Car of the Year last year, because it could do 20MPG!!! :oook:
The point is, that old LR I had was used properly. It had a tow bar, it was used almost daily to tow trailers through muddy fields, that's what it was designed for.
People buy SUVs for security because so many other people have SUVs that it's most likely that they're going to get hit by another one. That's the only justification behind security. No matter how big your car is, it isn't exactly bullet proof, at least without some serious mods.
Status? Plenty of normal cars out there which have status.
High driving position? Plenty of tall cars out there too which don't have stupid amounts of horsepower just so that they can move, due to the sheer weight of the vehicle in the first place.
Example: Why buy a BMW X5 when you could buy a 5-series Touring for less money. The 5-series is also faster, more efficient, and better handling, with just as much interior space.
Hell, most new SUVs were never even designed to do proper off-roading in the 1st place! They were designed purely to be large and imposing on the road! Take things like the Merc ML Class, BMW X5, Audi Q7 for example. They have 'features' that apparently make them able to go off road, like adaptive suspension and traction control etc. but in reality they struggle on wet grass.
From what I've seen on the roads in the UK, they shouldn't be called SUVs, they should be called UAVs. Urban Assault Vehicles. The people who drive them round here are agressive, big-headed idiots who do not heed for anybody else on the road. I have been tail-gated at 80mph several times by large, usually black SUVs. Once, in the space of 4 miles I was nearly shunted 3 times by the same moron in a Mercedes ML class because he was on his phone. I could see him on his phone by looking in my mirror, that's how close he was. Also, that's illegal anyway.
Some people buy them because they think an SUV will help in the 3 days of snow we get a year in the UK. In fact, that's the worst thing you can do. The heavier the vehicle, the more momentum it has. That's very bad on slippery surfaces. When I drive in the snow, I see a smashed up luxo-barge SUV nearly every day.
Really, Why is humanity so stupid sometimes? If it were possible to go back in time and prevent the whole 'SUV' thing starting, I would. Then we would only have proper 4x4s, used only by farmers, the military, and local authorities.
Sports Utility Vehicle. They're not exactly Sporty, they're not very useful or utilitarian. They are a vehicle, of sorts. One out of three then.