Jump to content
We promise no intrusive ads, Please help keep the community alive
Consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker / add to whitelist / purchasing VIP.

Cronos666

Modders
  • Posts

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Cronos666

  1. @Dextcloud

     

     

    I have already answered your question last time.

    But I see that you have a problem with reading comprehension and doing research of my data.

     

     

    You probably watched this video:

    But you did not read the description, where is written:

    "the 1.6l engine, prepared by my self".

     

     

    My data is from:

    Volkswagen Garbus – Wikipedia, wolna encyklopedia

    VW Käfer 1302

    Citroën 2 CV — Wikipédia

    Citroën 2CV - Wikipedia

     

     

    "Azam" or not "Azam", 2CV 425 cc or 602 cc look exactly the same. I gave a faster version, because even this version need from 0 to 100 kph 28 seconds. Do you really want a slower version?

    If you still can not accept facts then this is just your problem.

     

     

    PS. Guys also remember about the aerodynamics. Comparing a pretty modern car like Peugost 106 with similar power to project from World War II is ridiculous. Look for example at windscreen in VW, it's almost the same aerodynamic like a window in the kiosk.

  2. I disagree with you Dextcloud.

    You have wrong data. Beetle 1303 S (1970-1975) is 1584 cc, 50 hp, 0-100 km/h in 20 sec, top speed is 135 km/h [163 km/h? lol where did you get this crap data]. Anyway Beetle from TDU had 1192 cc, so it was probably 1200 (with ridiculous quick acceleration same as 2CV from TDU). All what I did is changed specification to faster version with 1584 cc engine. Same situation in Citroen 2 CV, I changed specification from 425 cc to 602 cc engine and that version has top speed 115 km/h.

×
×
  • Create New...