@Dextcloud
I have already answered your question last time.
But I see that you have a problem with reading comprehension and doing research of my data.
You probably watched this video:
But you did not read the description, where is written:
"the 1.6l engine, prepared by my self".
My data is from:
Volkswagen Garbus – Wikipedia, wolna encyklopedia
VW Käfer 1302
Citroën 2 CV — Wikipédia
Citroën 2CV - Wikipedia
"Azam" or not "Azam", 2CV 425 cc or 602 cc look exactly the same. I gave a faster version, because even this version need from 0 to 100 kph 28 seconds. Do you really want a slower version?
If you still can not accept facts then this is just your problem.
PS. Guys also remember about the aerodynamics. Comparing a pretty modern car like Peugost 106 with similar power to project from World War II is ridiculous. Look for example at windscreen in VW, it's almost the same aerodynamic like a window in the kiosk.