Alright fine. Utterly preposterous.
But who cares..... Its your call Adolf.
But i demand you to re-consider MB's picture.
A BM with a roll cage less exclusive than a X-Type?
Pfft...................... Now i've never seen that one.
EDIT: Yes you may not have said anything about price, but seeing that Jaguars are priced LOWER in the resale market than VWs, they're OBVIOUSLY less exclusive than the already non-exclusive Golf!
(i.e. MORE people can buy the Jag, making it LESS exclusive than the Golf. If you need it in black and white)
On that basis, you should reject your own picture too. Right?
Don't blame me that Jaguar makes cars that people don't want and thus accounting for its "exclusivity" :rolleyes:
Would you accept a Chevrolet then? Its common, not very exclusive. Cheap.
Then would you accept a Corvette then? Its a Chevy. If you would, its clear you have something against me.
A Mercedes Benz? You see that everyday right? Then why not an AMG? Because its the top of the range, the uber version? Then why are you allowing the vRS? Is it not the top spec, uber version Octavia?
Would you allow a Mondeo ST220? Sure! Its a Ford, its a Mondeo, and its rarer than a DB9 in the UK. Exclusivity, what it has. A Ford badge, what it also has. Does it badge determine its exclusivity? By your logic, yes it does. And since a ST220 is more exclusive than a DB9, then shouldn't a DB9 be allowed as well? I could go on forever baby.
Might as well have a theme that said "To my whim and fancy".
Quoting Baltoman here, Logic, you haz few...