Oh. My. *insert a nasty word*. God.
The level of detail is immense, there are some mistakes like the front of the GTR looks weird but it is still detailed, got it?
Models can be high quality even if the graphics aren't! Look at FM3. Everyone says it looks crappy. Then look at other games that have better graphics. "OMG DAT IS SO REALISTIC" even though it's the same "low quality just because the game looks crappy-model". High quality graphics can also exist without high quality models. Got it? Got it?
:hmmm: Let's see. There's a Zonda C12S, F, F roadster and Cinque. Now take your lazy arse to google, type in "Pagani Zonda C12S", find a picture of it, open a new window, google "Pagani Zonda Cinque" and find a picture of it. The Zondas are completely different cars, where the veyrons might be only paintjobs. I do agree that the Fs are basically the same cars, but hey, zondas are nice so it doesn't matter too much.
I have no idea about the RUFs, but at least in TDU1 there were no "almost same" RUFs.
And my point in the carlist count was that he said there are 70 cars where 30 are veyrons. So would you just kindly be quiet as I asked you to be?