Leaked Jaguar XJ 2010

SLRRR · July 9, 2009

Teaser interior

KoenigseggBG · July 9, 2009

Jaguar XF front, which is good but they could have come up with something new. As for the back, it's horrible. Those lights fit the car so badly and that big Jaguar logo. I'm sorry Jaguar, you could have done much better.

And3rs · July 9, 2009

I dont like the rear.... But the front looks good.

t. · July 9, 2009

The front looks good because its copy and paste from the XF, the back is awful.

Pherelas · July 9, 2009

Back looks like a bently, i don't mind it though, minimalist.

TDU 505 · July 9, 2009

Rear looks, cheap Chinese car rip-off. Sorry Jaguar.

CarMadMike · July 9, 2009

I love it, all of it

The back takes a bit to get used to, as pherelas said it's minimalist.

As for twm saying it's a copy and paste, it's the same person that designed the XF, ian callum, so of course they are going to be similar, as thats what jaguars are going to look like for a while, and i like it.

Homer_Bart · July 9, 2009

This car's looking great! Much better than the X300 XJ's, the retro design is over-played and over-used, and now, even the X350 is ugly.

hpluls · July 9, 2009

When the 1st pic was loading, I saw the roofline first and thought "wow, that's sexeh".

Then I saw the rear lights. :eek2:

Why? :cry:

KoenigseggBG · July 9, 2009

^ Yeah, too contrasting. Let's hope they'll change it a bit. ;)

Eudemon · July 9, 2009

I actually like the car as a whole. The rear is different to a typical Jag and I like it a lot!

t. · July 9, 2009

As for twm saying it's a copy and paste, it's the same person that designed the XF, ian callum, so of course they are going to be similar, as thats what jaguars are going to look like for a while, and i like it.

I have no objection to the new family look, sorry if that section sounded negative. Jags have needed a re vamp for a while, they have rapidly shed their "Old man" looks.

Jags were always nice cars but they didn't have the cool looks of their German rivals. Now however they do.

Still not into the back, it'll grow I expect.

Sponge · July 9, 2009

I like it, just that the rear lights look American. Which isn't bad in it's own world, but on a Jaguar, it's not right.

If given one for cheap, I'd take it. I still think it looks quite nice.

gingervette · July 9, 2009

As for now, my opinion is that the backend looks good, but does not match the front...at all. However, cars have a tendancy to grow on me. I will probably like it eventually.

Eudemon · July 9, 2009

I thought the back was more Bentley-esque than American, what american car has style like that? Come on now! lol

Covering the front of the car the rear is actually more Peugeot now I look at it.

Penfold · July 9, 2009

Looks a little like a Vauxhall Insignia/Bently on the back. The back is ok, i just think they should put their round badge instead of the jaguar because then it will be more symmetrical. :oook:

CarMadMike · July 9, 2009

Looks a little like a Vauxhall Insignia/Bently

Thats exactly what i was thinking too, the back would look better more sportier, the XJR will look stunning.

T1M · July 9, 2009

The front is nice, but the back is meh. They could have done a better job at the back

Shy Guy · July 9, 2009

I hate the rear.

Jacob · July 9, 2009

It's An XF With A LWB lol

Who · July 9, 2009

bar the back it's hot, indeed the front is quite XF-ish however, it looks like the grill is more vertical and protruding (like the arnage) and the shape of teh headlights look new too.

the rear isn't jaguar though, not at all, and it's all due to those lights, if you try to picture them off the design and focus on the contours you can see a very nice shape, the lights aren't even that bad if you ignore the weird wrap around part, i'd have it if it didnt have that stupid bit at the top of the lights...