Jump to content
We promise no intrusive ads, Please help keep the community alive
Consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker / add to whitelist / purchasing VIP.

Leaderboard

  1. StarGT

    StarGT

    Modders


    • Points

      10

    • Posts

      2,464


  2. calster17

    calster17

    Members


    • Points

      6

    • Posts

      3,344


  3. Camel

    Camel

    Members


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      13,380


  4. MichaelB450

    MichaelB450

    Modders


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      360


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/03/2016 in all areas

  1. later --- Post Updated --- this pack 1.7 will be very cool , much better than Dream packs p.s. *my opinion
    5 points
  2. A picture of Skylark on the last lap... :lol:
    3 points
  3. today i want to show new car for future TDU2 AutoPack ver.1.7
    2 points
  4. 48.252 in the Ford F-100
    1 point
  5. That's my opinion, also I didn't clarify what I was trying to say. What I mean't to say was that the 650S already looks like 2 cars that were already in the game and that were added it (the 12C and the P1). The 650S is basically a P1 front end on a 12C body (the P1 and the 12C did "Netflix and chill" and made it). It doesn't look bad in any way, but when I look at it I feel that McLaren could have made it look more unique and not like something that would be made in NFS 2015 (like with the Skyline R32 where one of the body kits has an R35 front end and the back end is a slightly updated R32).
    1 point
  6. 12C is not a spider, and 650S is faster, and there are not a lot of McLaren's :) I mean we have enough Ferrari's and Lambo's now.
    1 point
  7. Uh Star, why a 650S? We already have the 12C in the game and the 650S is basically the same as a 12C.
    1 point
  8. 1 point
  9. Are you going to choose the next theme now or wait a week? :p
    1 point
  10. I wouldn't be trusting benchmark scores on hardware where's you're aiming to scrape the minimum requirements. Benchmarks and games stress out hardware in different ways. Open world games with a high player velocity (i.e. 300kph+ vehicle vs walking) also bring about unique stresses compared to other games. Please do not try and use an Intel Atom for PC gaming. It is Intel's equivalent of the type of processor found in modern smart phones. The absolute worst CPU you should be looking at is an i3, if not an older i5, paired with a discreet graphics card. If money is the issue, look for a 5yo second hand gaming PC. A new i3 with HD4000 built-in graphics on its own may be able to play pre-2010 games at medium-low settings with around 30fps. That's if the game developers included any support for Intel graphics - some require AMD/nVidia GPUs.
    1 point


×
×
  • Create New...